| From: | snpe <snpe(at)snpe(dot)co(dot)yu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 To Do |
| Date: | 2002-12-01 15:57:28 |
| Message-ID: | 200212011557.28824.snpe@snpe.co.yu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 01 December 2002 05:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net> writes:
> > Oracle has finally surpassed PostgreSQL in some elements of
> > object-relational technology. Among the things you can do are:
> >
> > - Address components of objects using dot-notation. (select
> > employee.salary from employees)
>
> Cool. How do they resolve the conflict against schema notation
> (ie, is employee a table reference or a schema name here)?
>
There are simple name resolution rules
regards
Haris Peco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-01 16:24:18 | Re: 7.4 Wishlist |
| Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2002-12-01 12:50:25 | Re: 7.4 Wishlist |