Re: nested transactions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: nested transactions
Date: 2002-11-29 05:53:26
Message-ID: 200211290553.gAT5rQP20616@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > It only becomes better if we can throw away that file (or contents) when
> > the transaction completes and we have marked all the subtransactions as
> > completed. We can't compress pg_clog if we store the parent info in
> > there.
>
> But we already have a recycling mechanism for pg_clog. AFAICS,
> creating a parallel log file with a separate recycling mechanism is
> a study in wasted effort.

But that recycling requires the vacuum of every database in the system.
Do people do that frequently enough?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-29 05:56:02 Re: nested transactions
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-11-29 04:26:19 Re: Auto Vacuum Daemon (again...)