| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erwan DUROSELLE <EDuroselle(at)seafrance(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rép |
| Date: | 2002-11-27 12:24:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20021127122448.GA12176@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:28:29 +0100,
Erwan DUROSELLE <EDuroselle(at)seafrance(dot)fr> wrote:
> I have the same problem.
> AFAIK, this is not the usual behaviour for mailing lists.
It depends on what lists you use. Technical mailing lists are often set
up without munging reply-to headers.
You can use a mail-followup-to header to tell mail clients where followups
should be sent. This header is not supported by all mail clients, so
it isn't always going to work.
Mutt has a reply to list function. Russel Nelson is advocating that
mail client implementors provide a reply to recipients function, but I
don't know that anyone has yet.
Personally, I think the disadvantages of reply-to munging outweigh its
advantages.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rison, Stuart | 2002-11-27 12:41:17 | Re: Cannot execute null query - answer |
| Previous Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2002-11-27 12:23:12 | FreeBSD, Linux: select, select count(*) performance |