| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Eric B(dot) Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UNION and array types |
| Date: | 2002-11-22 21:50:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20021122215025.GA21740@wolff.to |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 16:29:07 -0500,
"Eric B. Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com> wrote:
> UNIONs don't appear to work when you are trying to union 2 tables that
> include array types.
> Example:
> create table foo (bar int8[]);
> insert into foo (bar) values ('{1,2,3}');
> select * from foo union select * from foo;
> ERROR: Unable to identify an ordering operator '<' for type 'bigint[]'
> Use an explicit ordering operator or modify the query
>
> Is it possible to make this work? Please tell me yes. :)
I think you can get by with union all if you don't care if duplicates stay.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank Bax | 2002-11-22 21:54:35 | Re: index vs seqscan question |
| Previous Message | Eric B.Ridge | 2002-11-22 21:29:07 | UNION and array types |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Daniel Franklin | 2002-11-22 22:43:12 | Getting started links |
| Previous Message | Eric B.Ridge | 2002-11-22 21:29:07 | UNION and array types |