Re: stange optimizer results

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: "Peter T(dot) Brown" <peter(at)memeticsystems(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stange optimizer results
Date: 2002-11-21 18:34:14
Message-ID: 20021121101430.J96861-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 21 Nov 2002, Peter T. Brown wrote:

> Hello--
>
> Attached is a file containing two SQL queries. The first take
> prohibitively long to complete because, according to EXPLAIN, it ignore
> two very important indexes. The second SQL query seems almost identical
> to the first but runs very fast because, according to EXPLAIN, it does
> uses all the indexes appropriately.
>
> Can someone please explain to me what the difference is here? Or if
> there is something I can do with my indexes to make the first query run
> like the second?

It doesn't take into account that in general a=b, b=constant implies
a=constant.

Perhaps if you used explicit join syntax for visitor joining
visitorextra it might help. Like doing:
FROM visitor inner join visitorextra on (...)
left outer join ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-11-21 18:35:37 Re: stange optimizer results
Previous Message Henrik Steffen 2002-11-21 18:20:16 Re: vacuum full