From: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
Date: | 2002-11-20 18:44:12 |
Message-ID: | 20021120184412.H25210@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:21:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
...
> > NetBSD 1.5 has revision 1.32, NetBSD 1.6 has revision 1.42
>
> Ah-hah, so it is a version issue --- we could make the resultmap line
> something like
> geometry/.*-netbsd1.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros
>
> Would you confirm what config.guess prints on your box --- in
> particular, is there a dot in the version number?
Yes:
NetBSD/i386-1.6H i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H (checked 7.3rc1)
NetBSD/acorn32-1.6K arm-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K (still building 7.3rc1)
(several NetBSDs probably come up with arm-unknown..)
Cheers,
Patrick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-20 18:51:28 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-20 18:23:34 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-20 18:51:28 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-20 18:23:34 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |