Re: RC1?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RC1?
Date: 2002-11-19 18:03:16
Message-ID: 200211191803.gAJI3GO02312@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports


Backed out. Peter. thanks for spotting that.

Patrick, would you please test 7.3RC1?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> He was testing 7.4devel. That's not the right one.
>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> >
> > Ports list updated:
> >
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Patrick Welche wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:06:01AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net> writes:
> > > > > OK OK, before anyone rubs my nose in it, i see the fork() failures :)
> > > >
> > > > > I'll see what's causing the fork() problems...
> > > >
> > > > Too low processes-per-user limit, likely.
> > >
> > > Success for
> > > PostgreSQL 7.4devel on acorn32-unknown-netbsd1.6K, compiled by GCC 2.95.3
> > >
> > > In other words NetBSD/acorn32-1.6K. The fork() problem for me was not
> > > enough memory, but checking with --schedule=./serial_schedule made it pass
> > > all the tests, except geometry, which leads me to change my mind and
> > > suggest:
> > >
> > > Index: resultmap
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/test/regress/resultmap,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.59
> > > diff -u -r1.59 resultmap
> > > --- resultmap 2002/11/12 20:02:32 1.59
> > > +++ resultmap 2002/11/19 15:20:19
> > > @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> > > geometry/alpha.*-freebsd4.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros
> > > geometry/i.86-.*-openbsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> > > geometry/sparc-.*-openbsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> > > -geometry/.*-netbsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> > > geometry/hppa.*-hpux9=geometry-positive-zeros
> > > geometry/hppa.*-hpux10=geometry-positive-zeros
> > > geometry/.*-irix6=geometry-positive-zeros
> > >
> > >
> > > as this acorn32 is running on a StrongARM processor, so has nothing to do
> > > with libm387. Maybe get rid of the geometry-positive-zeros and see if
> > > someone complains and tells me otherwise?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> > >
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: RC1? at 2002-11-19 17:22:08 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew V. 2002-11-19 18:20:28 Re: DECLARE CURSOR
Previous Message Billy O'Connor 2002-11-19 17:41:52 Re: Need Quote for 7.3

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-20 06:06:36 Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-11-19 17:22:08 Re: RC1?