From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ... |
Date: | 2002-11-15 03:02:25 |
Message-ID: | 20021114230056.N14204-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > If we are going to go for a beta6, I vote we reverse out the patch. Of
> > course, I prefer neither.
>
> I read this several times and am still not quite sure which path you are
> voting for. We can:
>
> 1. not apply the patch to fix Ross' problem, and ship RC1 tomorrow;
> 2. apply the patch, and ship RC1 tomorrow;
> 3. apply the patch and delay RC1.
>
> Which do you like?
>
> Personally I think this is a low-risk patch and so choice 2 is
> appropriate.
Go for it ... I'd like to get RC1 out this week, and if you feel its
low-risk, the worst case, we have to do an RC2 ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-15 03:08:01 | Re: psql tab completion |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-15 02:56:17 | FOR EACH STATEMENT triggers |