Re: CHECKPOINT_WARNING GUC variable addition

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CHECKPOINT_WARNING GUC variable addition
Date: 2002-11-13 04:10:56
Message-ID: 200211130410.gAD4AuK26763@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The following patch adds a GUC variable CHECKPOINT_WARNING which
> > generates a server log message if the checkpoint caused by WAL file
> > filling happens more frequently than (default) 30 seconds.
>
> + Checkpoints are fairly expensive because they force all dirty kernel
> + buffers to disk using the operating system <literal>sync()</> call.
> + Busy servers may fill checkpoint segment files too quickly,
> + causing excessive checkpointing. If such forced checkpoints happen
> + more than <varname>CHECKPOINT_WARNING</varname> seconds
>
> That should be: "happen more [frequently] than ..."

Great. New text:

+ Checkpoints are fairly expensive because they force all dirty kernel
+ buffers to disk using the operating system <literal>sync()</> call.
+ Busy servers may fill checkpoint segment files too quickly,
+ causing excessive checkpointing. If such forced checkpoints happen
+ more frequently than <varname>CHECKPOINT_WARNING</varname> seconds,
+ a message, will be output to the server logs recommending increasing
+ <varname>CHECKPOINT_SEGMENTS</varname>.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Billy G. Allie 2002-11-13 04:54:08 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src Makefile.global.in makefiles/ ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-13 04:09:41 Re: minor SGML fix