Re: Documentation bug report for LIMIT

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation bug report for LIMIT
Date: 2002-11-07 15:55:43
Message-ID: 200211071555.gA7FthA15441@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs


Interesting you picked that up. The comma for LIMIT was supported in
7.2.X only for backward compatibility, and was mentioned in the release
notes. It is _not_ supported in 7.3 anymore, where the separate
LIMIT/OFFSET clauses are the only supported syntax.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> In
> http://www6.jp.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/postgres/queries-limit.html
>
> it is stated that the syntax is:
>
> SELECT select_list
> FROM table_expression
> [LIMIT { number | ALL }] [OFFSET number]
>
> This following query is valid even though the syntax is wrong:
>
> select id from members order by id limit 5, 6
>
> If this "alternative" syntax is acceptable could you add this
> alternative syntax to the docs? Else, the parser needs to throw an error?
>
> SELECT select_list
> FROM table_expression
> [LIMIT { number | ALL }] [, [OFFSET] number]
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-07 16:52:16 Re:
Previous Message Jean-Christian Imbeault 2002-11-06 04:39:55 Documentation bug report for LIMIT