| From: | Vincent Janelle <random(at)goblinstudios(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DAFS? |
| Date: | 2002-10-31 20:22:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20021031152231.76a0aab2.random@goblinstudios.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
and I read the DAFS SDK, which didn't make claims to that.
If you mount it as a block device, then you can put a filesystem on it.
Problem solved.
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:06:04 -0700 (MST)
"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> wrote:
> Vincent, did you actually READ my post before writing yours?
>
> I said quite clearly that the device would be MOUNTED. I.e. it would
> have a file system on it.
>
> My point being that if you remote mount it as a block device, then the
>
> file system on the local machine caches (i.e. fast access) while the
> remote machine provides (semi-)fast block access across the network.
>
> diversity is a good thing.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Old | 2002-10-31 22:17:23 | my.cnf to postgresql.conf Conversion |
| Previous Message | Terry Liou | 2002-10-31 20:11:51 | licenses & price? |