| From: | Vincent Janelle <random(at)goblinstudios(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DAFS? |
| Date: | 2002-10-30 21:22:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20021030162247.2a441a90.random@goblinstudios.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 30 Oct 2002 08:47:18 -0500
Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> wrote:
> Graeme Hinchliffe <graeme(at)vianetworks(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>
> > but dafs isn't nfs. we were trialing netapp for storage but are
> > going back to local disks as the db ran VERY slowly in comparison.
> > dafs should accelerate things from what i have read.
>
> If it presents a POSIX filesystem API then PG should work OK with it.
>
> -Doug
Doesn't appear to. A quick scan of the SDK docs appears as though as if
its a direct implementation to access the storage of a device supporting
it by applications, such as database servers over a network.. Kinda like
raw devices.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2002-10-30 21:35:59 | Re: DAFS? |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-10-30 21:17:23 | Re: permission prob: granted, but still denied |