Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpq

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Darko Prenosil <darko(dot)prenosil(at)finteh(dot)hr>
Cc: hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpq
Date: 2002-10-29 17:39:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Darko Prenosil wrote:
> 	It is wrapper about libpq client library functions for use in PL/PSQL.
> I agreed with Joe Conway that it may fit within dblink, because dblink is much
> more easy to work with than the libpq, but sometimes it is Just not enough.
> So, the idea is to re-implement all important libpq functions like 
> PQConnectdb,
> PQExec ... and make one postgres server become just a client for another (or 
> another's) postgres server. As You know, dblink still does not support 
> simultaneous connections to two different databases, but with this it can !
> I agreed with Joe that when he is back from holiday he will take a look.

Brilliant idea.  I assume you added those functions and rewrote dblink
to use them.  dblink already is great, but by adding libpq inside
plpgsql, all sorts of other things become possible.  

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: plpq at 2002-10-29 08:27:11 from Darko Prenosil

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-10-29 18:02:54
Subject: Re: 7.3b3 on MacOSX 10.2.1
Previous:From: Magnus Naeslund(f)Date: 2002-10-29 17:16:15
Subject: Re: Request for supported platforms

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group