Re: [BUGS] Optimization disaster

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew McMillan <andrew(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Dietrich <hoglabogla(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Optimization disaster
Date: 2002-10-24 00:07:50
Message-ID: 200210231707.50016.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-novice


Deitrich,

> > The following Query needs about 0,2 seconds with SEQ_SCAN set to OFF
> > and 150 seconds with SEQ_SCAN set to ON:

1. When was the last time you ran "VACUUM ANALYZE"?

2. How about sending us an EXPLAIN if you need help?

3. There is a new list, PGSQL-PERFORMANCE, that is intended for discussion of
these kinds of problems. Please join it.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arne Woerner 2002-10-24 08:59:53 Re: 10 concurrent clients / pure insert SQL scripts (each 100000 lines)
Previous Message Andrew McMillan 2002-10-24 00:02:15 Re: [BUGS] Optimization disaster

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-10-24 04:41:57 Re: how to create secondary key!!
Previous Message Andrew McMillan 2002-10-24 00:02:15 Re: [BUGS] Optimization disaster