From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomasz Myrta <jasiek(at)klaster(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sub-select with aggregate |
Date: | 2002-10-23 15:27:45 |
Message-ID: | 20021023082355.G5481-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> Did you see the other two queries I gave? On 7.3, both of those queries
> appear (according to explain output) to do the limiting of group_id
> inside the subquery rather than doing the subquery with all rows.
> The explanation above was why I believe it was different from your
> original query.
Replying to myself with a clarification.
The other forms only move the filtering clauses around. There's still
only a filter on the outer group_id equaling the inner group_id and
a filter on group_id=3. It's just a question of whether it's:
Scan users in subselect from group_id=3, group and aggregate them
and join with users on subselect's group_id = users.group_id
or
Scan users for group_id=3, scan users in subselect, group and
aggregate them and join these two on subselect's
group_id=users.group_id.
The latter is effectively what your original query gave, the former
appears to be what my two queries from a couple of mails ago gives.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-10-23 15:57:47 | Re: sub-select with aggregate |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-10-23 15:12:27 | Re: sub-select with aggregate |