Re: ECPG and bison

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG and bison
Date: 2002-10-21 14:42:20
Message-ID: 200210211442.g9LEgKB12165@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:16:29PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Looks like threre is a 1.75 out (based on a FreeBSD PR I just saw fly
> > > by).
> >
> > I can confirm that:
>
> I just tried Marc's installation of 1.75 and compared the result with my
> 1.50 compiled version of ecpg grammar and found both .c files to be
> identical. Seems the changes didn't effect the parser output.

Oh, that's very good news. Makes me feel a little more secure.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-21 15:02:43 Re: Please help
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-21 14:16:11 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?