| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Carl Anderson <candrsn(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: default namespace (schema) confusion |
| Date: | 2002-10-18 02:26:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200210180226.g9I2QZo13472@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Carl Anderson <candrsn(at)mindspring(dot)com> writes:
> > this use of "@" in the default schema is a bit counter intuitive
> > so I offer the following patch against CVS
>
> Hmm, this seems like a wart, but then the db_user_namespace feature
> is an acknowledged wart already.
>
> I think I'd be willing to hold still for this if it happens only when
> db_user_namespace is on. Comments anyone?
I dislike double-testing the username in schema areas but not other
places. Seems if we do it, we should do it consistently for all
username references, or not at all.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-18 02:36:43 | Re: default namespace (schema) confusion |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-18 02:20:01 | Re: default namespace (schema) confusion |