Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database

From: Chris Miles <chris_pg002(at)psychofx(dot)com>
To: "Chad R(dot) Larson" <chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Date: 2002-10-14 12:17:14
Message-ID: 20021014131714.A18413@psychofx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

We use V3 over TCP for our NFS mounts from Netapp. Mount options are
actually: hard,intr,vers=3,proto=tcp,suid,rsize=32768,wsize=32768

Cheers,
CM

On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:15:15PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> I think the version of the NFS protocol you can use is =very=
> important. For example, regarding file locking: V1 didn't do it at all
> (every transaction was supposed to be stateless, which means persistent
> requests were just an error. In V2, support for locking was defined, but
> many implementations always returned successful and didn't actually do
> anything. I believe that V3 gets locking right, but I don't know about fsync.

--
Chris Miles
chris(at)psychofx(dot)com
http://www.psychofx.com/chris/

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-14 14:04:12 Re: Statistic collector too many fork
Previous Message CoL 2002-10-14 10:04:24 Re: Opening 5432 port