Re: 7.3b2 ?bug? bitfromint4 is not working

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neophytos Demetriou <k2pts(at)cytanet(dot)com(dot)cy>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.3b2 ?bug? bitfromint4 is not working
Date: 2002-10-14 04:11:37
Message-ID: 200210140411.g9E4BbB07735@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Do we need an initdb to fix command tags? I thought that was just a
> > change in the Query structure.
>
> A change in Query struct breaks stored rules. Looks like initdb
> material to me ...

Oh, I forgot about stored rules. Yep, that would cause it. Not sure if
fixing rule return is a valid initdb reason, but with the 'bit' type
problem, seems it would be worth while. I am going to post in a few
minutes about a push to get all those open items wrapped up. I think we
are drifting.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-14 04:12:10 Re: \copy needs work (was Re: Changing Column Order)
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-10-14 04:08:31 Re: Disabling triggers (was Re: pgsql 7.2.3 crash)