Re: inline newNode()

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inline newNode()
Date: 2002-10-11 17:24:44
Message-ID: 200210111724.g9BHOie23113@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I assume the GEQO results he is seeing is only for a tests, and that the
> > macro version of newNode will help in all cases.
>
> Well are we just assuming here or are we fixing actual problems based on
> real analyses?

What is your point? He is testing GEQO, but I assume other places would
see a speedup from inlining newNode.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message darren 2002-10-11 17:51:33 Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Previous Message Dror Matalon 2002-10-11 17:12:31 Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-11 17:41:55 Re: INSTALL updates
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-10-11 16:41:01 Re: INSTALL updates