Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: inline newNode()

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inline newNode()
Date: 2002-10-11 17:24:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I assume the GEQO results he is seeing is only for a tests, and that the
> > macro version of newNode will help in all cases.
> Well are we just assuming here or are we fixing actual problems based on
> real analyses?

What is your point?  He is testing GEQO, but I assume other places would
see a speedup from inlining newNode.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: darrenDate: 2002-10-11 17:51:33
Subject: Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Previous:From: Dror MatalonDate: 2002-10-11 17:12:31
Subject: Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-10-11 17:41:55
Subject: Re: INSTALL updates
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-10-11 16:41:01
Subject: Re: INSTALL updates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group