Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup
Date: 2002-10-09 00:26:57
Message-ID: 200210090026.g990QvM07007@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2002 at 13:48, Neil Conway wrote:
>
> > "Sandeep Chadha" <sandeep(at)newnetco(dot)com> writes:
> > > Postgresql has been lacking this all along. I've installed postgres
> > > 7.3b2 and still don't see any archive's flushed to any other
> > > place. Please let me know how is hot backup procedure implemented in
> > > current 7.3 beta(2) release.
> > AFAIK no such hot backup feature has been implemented for 7.3 -- you
> > appear to have been misinformed.
>
> Is replication an answer to hot backup?

We already allow hot backups using pg_dump. If you mean point-in-time
recovery, we have a patch for that ready for 7.4.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-09 00:28:12 Re: deadlock detected
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-09 00:10:04 Re: firstest doubts...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-10-09 02:19:34 Italian version of the PostgreSQL "Advocacy and Marketing" site is ready
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-09 00:07:30 Re: inline newNode()