| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marie G(dot) Tuite" <marie(dot)tuite(at)edisonaffiliates(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql-General(at)Postgresql(dot) Org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: sloooow query |
| Date: | 2002-10-08 00:03:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20021008000308.GA28930@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:22:09PM -0500, Marie G. Tuite wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am experiencing slow db performance. I have vacuumed, analyzed, reindexed
> using the force option and performance remains the same - dog-slow :( If I
> drop and recreate the database, performance is normal, so this suggests a
> problem with the indexes? I also took a look at the postgresql.conf and all
> appears fine. There are many instances of the same database running on
> different servers and not all servers are experiencing the problem.
We need more details if you wish to receive useful answers. Query/EXPLAIN
output/schema, etc
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that can do binary
> arithmetic and those that can't.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-10-08 00:36:59 | Re: PLTCL return_null crash... |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2002-10-07 22:49:08 | Design question, Does postgres provide a simpler solution than the obvious? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-08 05:44:11 | Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance |
| Previous Message | Marie G. Tuite | 2002-10-07 22:12:41 | Re: sloooow query |