Re: anoncvs and diff

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: anoncvs and diff
Date: 2002-10-03 16:36:01
Message-ID: 200210031636.g93Ga1l10375@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> It gave me the log all the way up to the 1.64 revision with the REL7_3_STABLE
> label assigned to revision 1.64.0.2
>
> Revision 1.64 apparently backing out my patch which made 1.63.
>
> I had a brain wave and did the cvs log command which was what lead me to try
> specifying revisions. As I say it looks like a lack of knowledge about how cvs
> works for these things. I always thought it worked like RCS and gave a diff
> against the latest checked in but obviously not.
>
> BTW, I've found Neil Conway's patch for this file, email dated 25th Sept., I
> can forward it or apply it and include the changes along with whatever I do for
> my next submission, which ever you'd prefer. I'd suggest it's easy to let me
> apply and submit it due to overlaps.
>

Sure, sounds good.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2002-10-03 16:44:09 Re: Large databases, performance
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-10-03 16:35:24 Re: Large databases, performance