Re: Do we want a CVS branch now?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we want a CVS branch now?
Date: 2002-09-30 14:48:43
Message-ID: 200209301448.g8UEmhk12841@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >> I don't think we want a branch for 7.4 yet. We still have lots of open
> >> issues and the branch will require double-patching.
>
> > Merge the changes on the 7.3 branch into the 7.4 branch after 7.3 is
> > released.
>
> Why is that better than the other direction?
>
> We can't afford to allow much divergence between the two branches so
> long as we are engaged in wholesale double-patching, so I think it
> really comes down to the same thing in the end: we are not ready for 7.4
> development to start in earnest, whether there's a CVS branch for it or
> not.

Yes. We need a decision now because I don't know which branch to touch.
Marc, I need your feedback on these ideas. There is discussion about
fixing earthdistance. Perhaps we fix that and remove the 7.3 tag and
just have everyone CVS checkout again.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-30 15:02:17 Re: current_timestamp after queries
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-30 14:42:08 Re: [SQL] arrays