| From: | snpe <snpe(at)snpe(dot)co(dot)yu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Kovacs <peter(dot)kovacs(at)sysdata(dot)siemens(dot)hu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Prepared statement performance... |
| Date: | 2002-09-28 15:06:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200209281706.48375.snpe@snpe.co.yu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
...
> This certainly isn't true for all databases. Oracle for example where
> the database format for dates is DD-MON-YY which is very different from
> the Timestamp.toString() method. And actually the postgres format is
> different and incompatible with javas format when you start having to
> deal with timezone information.
Oracle have nls_format_date global parameter and default format for date can
be any.
regrads
haris peco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-28 16:25:54 | Re: [JDBC] Prepared statement performance... |
| Previous Message | Peter Kovacs | 2002-09-28 14:20:48 | Re: [JDBC] Prepared statement performance... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Crystal IQ Support | 2002-09-28 15:21:14 | JDBC for 7.2.x |
| Previous Message | Peter Kovacs | 2002-09-28 14:20:48 | Re: [JDBC] Prepared statement performance... |