Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date: 2002-09-25 22:29:43
Message-ID: 200209252229.g8PMThL04601@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I already have a TODO item:
> > * Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]
> > I am unsure if it will be fixed in 7.3 or not. It is still on the open
> > items list, and I think we have a general plan to fix it.
>
> I got distracted and wasn't following the thread a few days ago about
> the topic. Did people come to a consensus about how it should work?

Well, sort of. It was similar to your original proposal. See the TODO
link for details. I am heading out for 2 hours and will summarize when
I return.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-25 22:35:29 postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2002-09-25 22:28:21 Re: Relation 0 does not exist