| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) |
| Date: | 2002-09-19 02:28:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20020918232754.H53125-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think you are confusing the open items list with the TODO list. TODO
> usually has some basis, while open items is just that, things we need to
> decide on. Peter brought it up and wanted it on the list so I put it
> on. I can be taken off just as easily. I put Peter's name on the item,
> and a question mark. The open items list is just so we don't forget
> things.
I'm in agreement with Thomas here ... unless a problem has been defined a
bit more specifically then 'it isn't posix compliant', it shouldn't be
considered an open item ... please remove?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-19 02:32:43 | Re: [HACKERS] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-09-19 02:27:31 | Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) |