Re: LIMIT within UNION?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Perrin <clists(at)perrin(dot)socsci(dot)unc(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIMIT within UNION?
Date: 2002-09-12 20:20:28
Message-ID: 200209121320.28318.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Andrew,

Another approach, one that does not require you to know before constructing
the query how many eligible subjects there are, is not to use a union at all:

SELECT * FROM (
SELECT ... , zip
FROM participants
WHERE (typenr = 1 and <eligibility criteria)
OR (typenr = 2)
ORDER BY (typenr = 1 and <eligibility criteria>) DESC
LIMIT 200 ) p1
ORDER BY zip;

The inner query gives you all of the records that meet the eligibility
criteria, plus all of the records that have typenr = 2, in the order of
whether or not they meet the criteria (as a boolean value) and truncates it
at 200 records.
The outer query then re-sorts this result in zip order.

This seems, to me, much more flexible than using a UNION query.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-09-12 20:54:25 Re: Latitude / Longitude
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-12 20:18:19 Re: LIMIT within UNION?