| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open items |
| Date: | 2002-09-12 01:51:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20020911225055.O57037-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > On Hold
> > > -------
> > > Point-in-time recovery
> > > Win32 port
> > > Security audit
> >
> > Why is the security audit on hold? This is the best time to do it, while
> > the code is reasonably static :(
>
> It is on hold in the sense it is not a item that has to be completed for
> 7.3 but is in on-going, like the other items. The other items have to
> be specifically marked as "done" before the 7.3 release.
Ah, k ... maybe put it under a 'Non Critical' or 'Ongoing' category?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2002-09-12 02:07:23 | Re: fix for palloc() of user-supplied length |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2002-09-12 01:50:21 | Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading |