Re: 7.3beta and ecpg

Dann Corbit wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:10 PM
> > To: Michael Meskes
> > Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker; Marc G. Fournier
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.3beta and ecpg
> >
> >
> >
> > I think we should stop playing around with ecpg. Let's get
> > the beta bison on postgresql.org and package the proper ecpg
> > version for 7.3beta2. If we don't, we are going to get zero
> > testing for 7.3 final.
> >
> > Marc?
> >
> > We will not find out if there are problems with the bison
> > beta until we ship it as part of beta and I don't think we
> > have to be scared of just because it is beta.
>
> I have a dumb idea...
>
> Why not just package the output of the Bison beta version?
>
> It may not be comprehensible, but it does not need to be generated on
> any particular target machine does it?
>
> Sure, it would be nice to be able to process the original grammar on any
> client workstation. But if it will hold up the entire project, why not
> just ship the preprocessed output?

We do ship just the preprocessed output. We need the new bison on
postgresql.org and we need the CVS to be updated for the new version and
then beta2 will hold the proper bison output.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073