| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: contrib features during beta period |
| Date: | 2002-08-30 14:35:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200208301035.39264.lamar.owen@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 30 August 2002 09:29 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > Does this mean we should be looking for a way to integrate [FTI] into the
> > main backend at this point? Isn't that what contrib is for?
> Well, given that Chris also thinks that people should migrate to
> tsearch, I'd guess that fulltextindex would not be the one to integrate.
> But yeah, in the long run I'd like to see one of these packages become
> mainstream, just because full-text search is such a widely used feature.
Agreed. We don't really have guidelines for this process; any idea what was
the last module moved over like that? There may be more modules to consider
-- earthdistance, for instance, which has been with us for a long time.
> The more global point here is that during beta we need everyone to be
> doing testing, bug fixing, and documentation, not new features ---
> even if they're in contrib. Goodness knows there's not very much
> organization to the Postgres project, but let's try to respect what
> little process we do have...
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-30 14:46:10 | Re: Accessing original TupleDesc from SRF |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-30 14:21:57 | Re: Accessing original TupleDesc from SRF |