| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | mail(at)joeconway(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch |
| Date: | 2002-08-30 01:25:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20020830.102548.26275686.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > Here's a patch to address Tom's SRF API memory management concerns, as
> > discussed earlier today on HACKERS.
>
> Patch committed.
>
> It seemed to me that pgstattuple.c does not really want to be an SRF,
> but only a function returning a single tuple.
Thank you for modifying pgstattuple.c. You are right, it does not want
to return more than 1 tuple.
> As such, it can provide
> a fine example of using the funcapi.h tuple-building machinery *without*
> the SRF machinery. I changed it accordingly, but am not able to update
> README.pgstattuple.euc_jp; Tatsuo-san, would you handle that?
Sure. I'll take care of that.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2002-08-30 01:28:08 | Re: Type definition process (was Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-30 01:20:14 | Re: tweaking MemSet() performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-30 01:29:45 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-30 00:46:24 | Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about memory management with SRFs) |