Re: Open 7.3 items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Date: 2002-08-28 01:08:01
Message-ID: 200208280108.g7S181c00772@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > global usernames are stored just like before, e.g. postgres
> > local users are stored as user(at)dbname
> > when connecting, global users add '@' to their names
> > when connecting, local users use just their user name, no @dbname
>
> I'm OK with this in principle. But I must say I was quite confused
> because the "@" symbol appears in diametrically opposite contexts:
>
> a) designate local users on the server
>
> b) designate global users in the client
>
> Perhaps I might have been less confused if meaning (b) used a different
> character, say "username!". This might be equally confusing to the next
> person -- just my observation.

There is no question it is 100% confusing. You are not alone.

What keeps us from unconfusing it is the desire to make local usernames
clean looking, I think.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-28 01:45:55 Re: LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-28 01:07:04 Re: Open 7.3 items