Re: Partial digest for the pgsql-admin list

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partial digest for the pgsql-admin list
Date: 2002-08-26 17:23:54
Message-ID: 20020826132354.I22309@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:43:29PM -0400,
pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:

> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:04:23 -0400
> From: Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>
> To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: VACUUM on multi-CPU systems?
> Message-ID: <akdjh0$j5b$1(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org>
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on whether my database vacuum/full/analyze
> might go faster on our 2-CPU system if I generated the VACUUM commands
> into a script, e.g.,

We do that. It does speed things up, assuming you aren't using the
other CPU at the same time (which you wouldn't be just in case
there's no query on the other CPU which is blocked on a
currently-vacuuming table). Remember to background the vacuum call
from your shell, or the script will only run the vacuums in series.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge St
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurette Cisneros 2002-08-26 18:19:27 Monitoring postgresql
Previous Message Jeff Boes 2002-08-26 16:04:23 VACUUM on multi-CPU systems?