Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql
Date: 2002-08-16 19:50:21
Message-ID: 200208161950.g7GJoLn05309@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


[ Tom will review.]

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> >
> > >> A couple of bits of the depend/constraint patch that were not applied.
> >
> > Again, this is code I still gotta review...
>
> The attached better handles constraint triggers which are not foreign
> keys. It helps 7.2.
>
> Is there any reason to create new constraint triggers? Could the
> CONSTRAINT clause be removed after a couple of releases?
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-16 20:22:55 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE()
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-08-16 19:40:40 Re: Foreign key in pg_dump / psql