Re: Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1
Date: 2002-08-16 17:05:37
Message-ID: 200208161705.g7GH5bT22805@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


It is already there, I think:

fix implicit type coercions that are worse

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barry Lind wrote:
> Then shouldn't this appear on the "Open 7.3 issues" list that has been
> circulating around? This seems like an open issue to me, that needs to
> be addressed before 7.3 ships.
>
> --Barry
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>You can no long insert large values into a bigint column without a
> >>cast.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This seems to be fallout from the move to tighten up implicit coercions
> >(cf http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-04/msg00528.php
> >as well as lots of earlier discussions).
> >
> >I said right along that this topic needed more debate, but we haven't
> >gotten back to looking at it. We have a number of other nasty behaviors
> >in current sources that trace back to altering the set of available
> >coercions.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-16 17:30:03 Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-16 17:04:35 Re: Admin nice-to-have's