Re: Open 7.3 issues

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 issues
Date: 2002-08-16 15:24:21
Message-ID: 200208161524.g7GFOL019824@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> What does -f do?
>
> > There is concern that using pg_resetxlog by accident could cause
> > problems, so it will prompt the user for confirmation by default. -f
> > (force) disables that confirmation.
>
> pg_resetxlog already has an -f switch, and I do not think you should
> change its semantics. At least not without putting up a better argument
> than the above. Anyone who's running pg_resetxlog had already better
> know what they're doing.

I hadn't looked at flags yet. Thomas's concern, and I think a valid
one, is that if we move it from contrib into the main tree, people may
accidentally run pg_resetxlog without understanding the issues involved.
We have it /contrib partly to make sure it isn't installed in the
default path for all admins.

What do people want? We can rethink this.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2002-08-16 15:25:28 Re: Coding help
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-16 15:20:34 Re: Open 7.3 items, with names