Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS

From: strange(at)nsk(dot)yi(dot)org
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Date: 2002-08-13 18:39:01
Message-ID: 20020813193900.A1800@nsk.yi.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 02:09:07PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:45:59PM +0100, strange(at)nsk(dot)yi(dot)org wrote:
>
> > support isn't compiled, I didn't see one occuring from any application
> > having the support, but not the filesystem. (Your "not so standard
>
> Wrong. The symptom is _exactly the same_ if the program doesn't have
> the support, the filesystem doesn't have the support, or both, at
> least on Solaris. I've checked.

??

My point is that: Having postgresql the support doesn't bring NEW errors.

I never said postgresql would automagically gain support on filesystems
that don't support largfiles, I said no one mentioned an error caused by
postgresql *having* the support, but *not the filesystem*. Maybe I wasn't
clear, but I meant *new* errors.

As it seams, adding support to largefiles doesn't break anything.

Regards,
Luciano Rocha

--
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Swinth 2002-08-13 18:53:21 Read Lock For Foreign Key
Previous Message Robert L Mathews 2002-08-13 18:27:48 extract () and interval formatting

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-13 19:03:21 Re: db partial dumping with pg_dump
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-13 18:16:49 Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks