Re: Wanted: RelationIsVisible interface

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wanted: RelationIsVisible interface
Date: 2002-08-10 01:56:45
Message-ID: 200208100156.g7A1ujS21079@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


OK, let's get started updating all our db access routines. We only have
22 days left until beta.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joe Conway wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > At any rate, I will play with the RelationIsVisible stuff when somebody
> > writes a SQL interface to it (or I write it myself, but that will take
> > quite a long time :)
> >
>
> Looks like Tom just committed this; see:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/catalog/namespace.c.diff?r1=1.29&r2=1.30
>
> Datum pg_table_is_visible(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
> Datum pg_type_is_visible(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
> Datum pg_function_is_visible(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
> Datum pg_operator_is_visible(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
> Datum pg_opclass_is_visible(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
>
> They all accept an oid and return bool.
>
> Joe
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-10 01:59:30 Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-08-10 01:54:44 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/tcop/postgres.cbacke