Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sugita(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata
Date: 2002-08-01 01:17:47
Message-ID: 200208010117.g711Hl212078@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > I thought they were in /contrib because we didn't want them by default
> > in the admin's path. They have to go looking for them to use them. Is
> > that still a valid concern?
>
> May be a valid concern, but not the right solution.
>
> If we are that worried about misuse, then we should have them print a
> banner and prompt for confirmation. And have them accept a "-q" to just
> shut up and do it.

OK, if you want it for 7.3, we need the flag added, and a manual page
written about it. Should I add it to open items?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-01 03:23:23 Improve CHECK failure message
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-07-31 23:09:12 Re: int64 timestamp patch for contrib/pg_controldata