Re: WAL file location

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL file location
Date: 2002-07-31 14:50:03
Message-ID: 20020731105003.B28840@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:23:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> > a. The system uses no environment variables at all; some other
> > method is used to determine where the config file is (maybe compiled
> > into the code);
>
> > If I understand it, nobody is really arguing for (a).
>
> I am. I see absolutely no advantage in depending on environment

Ok, how then would one set the location of the config file? Though I
mentioned it, I don't really thing that compiled-in is an option: I
don't want to have to have four versions of the binary to just to run
four postmasters on four ports. Maybe a --with-config-file option to
start the postmaster?

And I presume this is all for the server only, right? Nobody is
talking about getting rid of (for instance) $PGPORT for clients,
right? (I'm sorry if I seem obtuse, or if this is really none of my
business, since I'm not offering to fix this up, since I can't. But
I'm very keen to make sure that administration of large postgres
installations doesn't become terribly difficult.)

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-07-31 14:55:00 Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items )
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-31 14:37:51 Re: Rules and Views