Re: Password sub-process ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Password sub-process ...
Date: 2002-07-30 05:07:25
Message-ID: 200207300507.g6U57Pd08326@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> You seem to have done a nice job with the + and @ for 'maps' ... how about
> third on that states that the map file has a username:password pair in it?
>
> I do like how the pg_hba.conf has changed, just don't like the lose of
> functionality :(

OK, but the only logic for using it is your duplicate users. There
would be no other reason someone would use such a feature, right?

I assume it would be MD5?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-30 05:09:55 statement_timeout
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-07-30 05:04:35 Re: Password sub-process ...