| From: | nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: question on backends |
| Date: | 2002-07-29 16:11:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20020729161119.GA7756@klamath.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:28:54PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> libpq has a function pconnect as opposed to connect that will do it.
libpq has neither function, AFAIK.
As for persistent backends, it's on the TODO list, but I'm not aware
that anyone has put any work into implementing it. At the moment,
a backend connects to a single database for its entire lifecycle -- so
you'd either need one pool of persistent backends for each database
in use, or you'd need to allow a backend to change the database it is
connected to.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-29 16:30:56 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-07-29 15:59:40 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |