| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: lock listing |
| Date: | 2002-07-20 02:21:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200207200221.g6K2LRS02368@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 08:59:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Even with userlocks enabled, I don't think you have to use them to use
> > PostgreSQL, so you should be OK. Of course, as soon as you load the
> > userlocks module, you have GPL'ed yourself.
>
> Ok, sounds reasonable to me.
>
> While we're on the topic, there was talk a couple months ago of removing
> or asking the authors to relicense the contrib/ modules that are GPL'd
> (or perhaps LGPL'd). Would this be a good idea? If so, I can do it...
Yes, Tom was going to address this.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-20 03:26:58 | Re: lock listing |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-07-20 01:04:10 | Re: lock listing |