Re: Mac OS X: system shutdown prevents checkpoint

From: sugita(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: bierman(at)apple(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mac OS X: system shutdown prevents checkpoint
Date: 2002-07-16 01:22:14
Message-ID: 20020716.102214.28791430.sugita@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:45:19 -0400

;;; However, that doesn't explain our OS X problem. I added some debug
;;; printouts, and can now report positively that (a) the fork() call
;;; returns normally in the parent process, providing an apparently-correct
;;; child PID value; but (b) the fork never returns in the child. It
;;; doesn't ever get as far as trying to enable SIGTERM.
&
;;; Is it possible that something in the child's fork() processing will wait
;;; around for a response from a service that's already died? Why is fork()
;;; dependent on any outside service whatever --- isn't that a certain
;;; recipe for system failures?

I asked Apple this issue. This is a bug of Mac OS X. The problem is registered
to their bug database for the appropriate eingineers for investigation.

Kenji Sugita

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Dougherty 2002-07-16 02:36:58 COPY seems to work, but no data in the table
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2002-07-15 23:45:15 Re: table size growing out of control

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-16 01:23:08 Re: Unused system table columns
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-16 01:01:43 Re: [HACKERS] english doc for tree module