Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly
Date: 2002-07-05 17:50:05
Message-ID: 200207051750.g65Ho5E25056@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > >> At some point, we may have to modify our name and start at 1.0 again.
> >
> > > Ya, that's it ... we've only spent, what, 8 years now making 'PostgreSQL'
> > > known, so let's change the name *just* so that we can start at 1.0 and
> > > face a new challenge of getting ppl to recognize the name?
> >
> > I've heard a number of people opine that we should go back to just plain
> > 'Postgres', which is pronounceable by the uninitiate, and besides which
>
> I can never figure this out ... what is so difficult about 'Postgres-Q-L'?

Beats me, but when the Addison-Wesley publisher called to talk to me
about doing a book, he called is Postgre. I knew we were in trouble.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-05 18:25:52 Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2002-07-05 17:38:58 Particular query optimization question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-05 18:08:57 Re: CLUSTER not lose indexes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-05 17:20:37 Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR)