Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Mark Frazer <mark(at)somanetworks(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)
Date: 2002-07-05 02:39:30
Message-ID: 200207050239.g652dU822949@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces pgsql-sql

Tom Lane wrote:
> Even uglier cases occur if some other connection has also created
> a temp table named foo. You should *not* see that in \d ... but
> you will.
>
> > I will mark the TODO as done.
>
> It's not really done, but the remaining fixes will fall out of making
> psql schema-aware.

The original bug is gone. We just have new ones.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Frazer 2002-07-05 13:38:30 Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-05 02:32:56 Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message teknokrat 2002-07-05 08:32:33 How do i return a dataset from a stored procedure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-05 02:32:56 Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)