| From: | nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL99 doc update |
| Date: | 2002-07-01 04:29:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20020701042921.GB12279@klamath.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:10:30PM -0700, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > This fixes 2 inaccuracies in the recently added SQL99 feature list docs.
> > UNIQUE and DISTINCT predicates are both listed as implemented -- AFAIK,
> > neither is.
>
> I'm working on adding the IS DISTINCT FROM clause. I haven't looked to
> see about UNIQUE. Remind me to readjust the docs when we get that
> working.
Glad you mentioned that -- I've started working on UNIQUE, and I was
planning to implement IS DISTINCT FROM after that (but I'm happy
to let you handle that).
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-01 04:37:29 | Re: SQL99 doc update |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-07-01 04:25:15 | Re: SQL99 doc update |