From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Kelly <quadratini(at)sni(dot)ph> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: selecting from integer[] |
Date: | 2002-06-29 14:32:02 |
Message-ID: | 20020629223021.L53109-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Well, you can always just UNION them - I don't know if there's a better
way tho.
select * from ...
union [all]
select * from ...
union [all]
select * from ...;
Chris
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Kelly wrote:
>
> select * from pg_user where usesysid=(select grolist[1] from pg_group
> where groname='mygroup');
> select * from pg_user where usesysid=(select grolist[2] from pg_group
> where groname='mygroup');
> select * from pg_user where usesysid=(select grolist[3] from pg_group
> where groname='mygroup');
>
> Can those three queries be merged to one query? (and still gives me
> those three rows)
> Or do I have to explicitly say grolist[1], grolist[2], etc....
>
> Thanks in advance :)
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-06-29 21:11:19 | Re: selecting from integer[] |
Previous Message | Kelly | 2002-06-29 11:48:57 | selecting from integer[] |