Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Date: 2002-06-28 19:29:37
Message-ID: 200206281929.g5SJTbL25384@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >> The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
> >> TODO says we don't...
>
> > TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.
>
> A moment's examination of gram.y would have convinced you that the
> docs are wrong ...

Oh, OK. In the future, the "A moment's examination" swipe isn't
required. :-( I suppose it makes you feel better.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-06-28 19:35:21 Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-28 19:21:33 Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?